<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments for belowthewaist.org</title>
	<link>http://belowthewaist.org</link>
	<description>Protecting, Informing &#038; Advocating For Reproductive Health Freedom</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 12:08:37 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>Comment on 57 Leading Groups Urge Administration to Abandon Proposed Rule that Would Limit Women&#8217;s Access to Essential Medical Services by Janet</title>
		<link>http://belowthewaist.org/2008/07/57-leading-groups-urge-administration-to-abandon-proposed-rule-that-would-limit-womens-access-to-essential-medical-services/#comment-219</link>
		<author>Janet</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 18:13:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://belowthewaist.org/2008/07/57-leading-groups-urge-administration-to-abandon-proposed-rule-that-would-limit-womens-access-to-essential-medical-services/#comment-219</guid>
		<description>The Association of Reproductive Health Professionals issued this alert to it's membership.  Please consider following this link to easily and electronically express your opinion about this proposal to HHS Secretary Leavitt.

http://capwiz.com/nfprha/home/ 

Dear ARHP member,

We have an urgent matter to bring to your attention. Recently, the Bush Administration proposed new regulations under which the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) would redefine pregnancy as beginning prior to implantation and adopt a definition of abortion that includes many forms of contraception, including some birth control pills, IUDs, and emergency contraception. Both of these proposed definitions are alarmingly at odds with science. This regulation would also allow health care providers and facility staff to refuse to provide any medical service – if doing so would violate their moral beliefs. 

If adopted, the new regulations could mean that providers of federally-funded family planning services could no longer guarantee their patients access to contraception. We cannot tolerate this last ditch attack on family planning as the Bush Administration prepares to leave office. 

To make it quick and easy for you to learn more about and take action on this outrageous proposal, ARHP has partnered with our colleagues at the National Family Planning and Reproductive Health Association (NFPRHA). Please click here (http://capwiz.com/nfprha/home/) to easily and electronically express your opinion about this proposal to HHS Secretary Leavitt.

Thank you for your quick response on this critical issue. 

Sincerely,
ARHP Policy Team</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Association of Reproductive Health Professionals issued this alert to it&#8217;s membership.  Please consider following this link to easily and electronically express your opinion about this proposal to HHS Secretary Leavitt.</p>
<p><a href="http://capwiz.com/nfprha/home/" rel="nofollow">http://capwiz.com/nfprha/home/</a> </p>
<p>Dear ARHP member,</p>
<p>We have an urgent matter to bring to your attention. Recently, the Bush Administration proposed new regulations under which the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) would redefine pregnancy as beginning prior to implantation and adopt a definition of abortion that includes many forms of contraception, including some birth control pills, IUDs, and emergency contraception. Both of these proposed definitions are alarmingly at odds with science. This regulation would also allow health care providers and facility staff to refuse to provide any medical service – if doing so would violate their moral beliefs. </p>
<p>If adopted, the new regulations could mean that providers of federally-funded family planning services could no longer guarantee their patients access to contraception. We cannot tolerate this last ditch attack on family planning as the Bush Administration prepares to leave office. </p>
<p>To make it quick and easy for you to learn more about and take action on this outrageous proposal, ARHP has partnered with our colleagues at the National Family Planning and Reproductive Health Association (NFPRHA). Please click here (http://capwiz.com/nfprha/home/) to easily and electronically express your opinion about this proposal to HHS Secretary Leavitt.</p>
<p>Thank you for your quick response on this critical issue. </p>
<p>Sincerely,<br />
ARHP Policy Team</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Appropriations Committee Sex Trading by MKay107</title>
		<link>http://belowthewaist.org/2008/06/appropriations-committee-sex-trading/#comment-68</link>
		<author>MKay107</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jun 2008 15:09:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://belowthewaist.org/2008/06/appropriations-committee-sex-trading/#comment-68</guid>
		<description>I completely agree with the article, Appropriations Committee Sex Trading. Voting for the Bush desires is not the way to lead. Women have been treated like property, with men making decisions affecting women's lives in even the very personal ways. 

The time is long overdue for Congress to relinguish control over women's rights. The United States is falling behind in so many areas, but has never been the best with women's rights.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I completely agree with the article, Appropriations Committee Sex Trading. Voting for the Bush desires is not the way to lead. Women have been treated like property, with men making decisions affecting women&#8217;s lives in even the very personal ways. </p>
<p>The time is long overdue for Congress to relinguish control over women&#8217;s rights. The United States is falling behind in so many areas, but has never been the best with women&#8217;s rights.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Pill Doesn’t Kill by Frances Irwin</title>
		<link>http://belowthewaist.org/2008/06/the-pill-doesn%e2%80%99t-kill/#comment-66</link>
		<author>Frances Irwin</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 15:26:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://belowthewaist.org/2008/06/the-pill-doesn%e2%80%99t-kill/#comment-66</guid>
		<description>Thanks for taking the time to chronicle the ridiculousness that we've faced in the last year.  Your advocacy for women here in Wisconsin has been critical to maintaining and improving access to basic health care for women.  I hope people take a minute to check out (and support) all that you do by visiting you at www.prochoicewisconsin.org!  Hope to hear from you soon!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for taking the time to chronicle the ridiculousness that we&#8217;ve faced in the last year.  Your advocacy for women here in Wisconsin has been critical to maintaining and improving access to basic health care for women.  I hope people take a minute to check out (and support) all that you do by visiting you at <a href="http://www.prochoicewisconsin.org" rel="nofollow">www.prochoicewisconsin.org</a>!  Hope to hear from you soon!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Teen Pregnancy Prevention by Lon Newman</title>
		<link>http://belowthewaist.org/2008/06/teen-pregnancy-prevention/#comment-59</link>
		<author>Lon Newman</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jun 2008 02:33:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://belowthewaist.org/2008/06/teen-pregnancy-prevention/#comment-59</guid>
		<description>thanks, Sue and panelists - a very real and interesting discussion.

--Lon--</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thanks, Sue and panelists - a very real and interesting discussion.</p>
<p>&#8211;Lon&#8211;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Caught Cybersquatting: Pregnancy Crisis Center Pulls Website by Andy</title>
		<link>http://belowthewaist.org/2008/04/caught-cybersquatting-pregnancy-crisis-center-pulls-website/#comment-31</link>
		<author>Andy</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 18:57:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://belowthewaist.org/2008/04/caught-cybersquatting-pregnancy-crisis-center-pulls-website/#comment-31</guid>
		<description>Great story!  Glad to see all has been resolved.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great story!  Glad to see all has been resolved.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Caught Cybersquatting: Pregnancy Crisis Center Pulls Website by Enrico S</title>
		<link>http://belowthewaist.org/2008/04/caught-cybersquatting-pregnancy-crisis-center-pulls-website/#comment-28</link>
		<author>Enrico S</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 16:30:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://belowthewaist.org/2008/04/caught-cybersquatting-pregnancy-crisis-center-pulls-website/#comment-28</guid>
		<description>We found this a very interesting cybersquatting article and have posted about it at the above link.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We found this a very interesting cybersquatting article and have posted about it at the above link.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Crisis Pregnancy Centers and the Story of Phyllis by Frances Irwin</title>
		<link>http://belowthewaist.org/2008/04/crisis-pregnancy-centers-and-the-story-of-phyllis/#comment-24</link>
		<author>Frances Irwin</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 19:23:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://belowthewaist.org/2008/04/crisis-pregnancy-centers-and-the-story-of-phyllis/#comment-24</guid>
		<description>Seriously this is ridiculous.  I'm tired of the unnecessary infliction of ideology/theology into medicine.  I believe that the only ideology/theology that matters in medical practice is that of the patient and the health care provider involved.  Should that provider be unable to provide a service in good consciousness for reasons that are not medical, the patient should be referred to another provider.  As a person of ethics and some faith, I really don't understand "the end justifies the means" morality.  In my observations of history that sort of justification tends to result in genocide.  The process matters on both a macro and a micro level.  It's time to move beyond the insular and tangible world we experience and open ourselves to the global experience of humanity.  Part of that experience for me has been learning about the diversity of social norms and customs among various religions, cultures, and ethnic groups.  In that context, the one-size fits all kind of morality experienced by "Phyllis" is completely impractical and has devastating effects on the health and lives of women and families around the globe.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seriously this is ridiculous.  I&#8217;m tired of the unnecessary infliction of ideology/theology into medicine.  I believe that the only ideology/theology that matters in medical practice is that of the patient and the health care provider involved.  Should that provider be unable to provide a service in good consciousness for reasons that are not medical, the patient should be referred to another provider.  As a person of ethics and some faith, I really don&#8217;t understand &#8220;the end justifies the means&#8221; morality.  In my observations of history that sort of justification tends to result in genocide.  The process matters on both a macro and a micro level.  It&#8217;s time to move beyond the insular and tangible world we experience and open ourselves to the global experience of humanity.  Part of that experience for me has been learning about the diversity of social norms and customs among various religions, cultures, and ethnic groups.  In that context, the one-size fits all kind of morality experienced by &#8220;Phyllis&#8221; is completely impractical and has devastating effects on the health and lives of women and families around the globe.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Roe V. Wade: Perspectives Podcast by SueK</title>
		<link>http://belowthewaist.org/2008/02/roe-v-wade-perspectives-podcast/#comment-11</link>
		<author>SueK</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2008 21:57:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://belowthewaist.org/2008/02/roe-v-wade-perspectives-podcast/#comment-11</guid>
		<description>My thoughts after listening to the interview with American Life League’s Judy Brown and Cathy Thompson from the Religious Coalition For Reproductive Choice: I believe there were some points forgotten or missed and felt compelled to respond with my recollections about abortion.

I was just three months old on the day of the Pearl Harbor Attack…December 7, 1941. I was 4 years old the year the US dropped Atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki. I reference these dates so a reader will know the decade I was born into and some sense of where the US was during that decade. 

I first heard the word abortion on a newsreel in the movie theater at about age 5or 6. Movies were cheap entertainment and my parents took the whole family at least twice a week. We saw reports of the war and shots of Roosevelt and Churchill and later Truman during those news reels. The news reels also reported on organized crime and how various well known organized crime bosses were being charged with providing abortions. Now, what I (at 5 and 6 and 7 years of age) thought was that abortion was a terrible thing that organized crime people were doing to vulnerable women in America. The crime figures were usually charged with providing abortion and tax evasion. As a child, I didn’t understand what tax evasion had to do with it.

After the war ended and there were less newsworthy events linked to organized crime, I didn’t see or hear the word abortion again until I was nearly an adult. In high school, sometimes when a girl got pregnant, her boyfriend wanted her to “get rid of it.” Usually no one knew what that meant or how that was possible so she continued to be pregnant. Many times girls went away. An enlightening book about the era is “The Girls Who Went Away, The Hidden History of Women Who Surrendered Children for Adoption in the Decades Before Roe V Wade” by Ann Fessler. 

One point not clear in the interviews was when contraception became available. Contraception wasn’t new in the 1960’s. 
My mother used a diaphragm and breastfeeding to achieve the birth spacing in our family. My father was familiar with condoms…which he called “safes” – a word used during the war I’ve learned. 

Did they have access to birth control? Yes. My father knew the store to go to in our township to purchase “safes” which were behind the counter and not openly discussed. My mother was able to get contraceptive care through her physician, most likely because she was married. The thing that happened in the early 1960s was that birth control pills were developed and sold. They were easy to use and extremely effective. The speakers were right…now the American woman could effectively control her fertility. I took some of those early birth control pills for 5 months in 1962. I took Enovid E and it cost $1.69 in the drug store. After using those birth control pills, I went on to have healthy pregnancies and healthy babies. When my family size was complete, I used birth control pills again. Countless women in my generation used birth control pills and most of them worked outside the home eventually. 

Another element:
The American woman moved into the workforce outside of her home out of necessity during World War II. She went back to being a woman focused solely on the work of her family after the war. However, women had learned from that war experience that they could do the work in the factory and in the office and they were good at it. They also filled many important roles in the medical community and had done so for decades. Financial necessity and personal interest sent women back into the workforce armed with a tool that would help them postpone pregnancy, achieve birth spacing and limit the size of their families. Fewer children in a family and Mom’s income helped the family maintain their health and raise and care for their children. 

I was already working outside the home by the time Roe v Wade happened in 1973. I came to work at a family planning provider in 1975. Some states had abortion available at that time. Sometimes women needed to travel outside of Wisconsin to obtain an abortion. Within a few years, first-trimester abortion became available in Wisconsin. Women from most parts of the state still had to travel to Madison, Milwaukee, Green Bay or Appleton. They needed a checkup 3 to 4 weeks after the procedure. By 1978 our family planning agency was providing on-site clinics and women came to the local family planning provider for their checkup rather than going out of town again. The confidentiality provided by the family planning clinic was essential to women and their families.

The statewide family planning providers in Wisconsin have prevented thousands and thousands of abortions by providing accessible, affordable, effective contraceptive methods. Today, those family planning providers have another tool to help prevent the unintended pregnancy. That is Emergency Contraception (EC). If taken as soon as possible after any unprotected sexual contact, EC can prevent pregnancy quite effectively.  			…Sue Kettner Family Planning Health Services</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My thoughts after listening to the interview with American Life League’s Judy Brown and Cathy Thompson from the Religious Coalition For Reproductive Choice: I believe there were some points forgotten or missed and felt compelled to respond with my recollections about abortion.</p>
<p>I was just three months old on the day of the Pearl Harbor Attack…December 7, 1941. I was 4 years old the year the US dropped Atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki. I reference these dates so a reader will know the decade I was born into and some sense of where the US was during that decade. </p>
<p>I first heard the word abortion on a newsreel in the movie theater at about age 5or 6. Movies were cheap entertainment and my parents took the whole family at least twice a week. We saw reports of the war and shots of Roosevelt and Churchill and later Truman during those news reels. The news reels also reported on organized crime and how various well known organized crime bosses were being charged with providing abortions. Now, what I (at 5 and 6 and 7 years of age) thought was that abortion was a terrible thing that organized crime people were doing to vulnerable women in America. The crime figures were usually charged with providing abortion and tax evasion. As a child, I didn’t understand what tax evasion had to do with it.</p>
<p>After the war ended and there were less newsworthy events linked to organized crime, I didn’t see or hear the word abortion again until I was nearly an adult. In high school, sometimes when a girl got pregnant, her boyfriend wanted her to “get rid of it.” Usually no one knew what that meant or how that was possible so she continued to be pregnant. Many times girls went away. An enlightening book about the era is “The Girls Who Went Away, The Hidden History of Women Who Surrendered Children for Adoption in the Decades Before Roe V Wade” by Ann Fessler. </p>
<p>One point not clear in the interviews was when contraception became available. Contraception wasn’t new in the 1960’s.<br />
My mother used a diaphragm and breastfeeding to achieve the birth spacing in our family. My father was familiar with condoms…which he called “safes” – a word used during the war I’ve learned. </p>
<p>Did they have access to birth control? Yes. My father knew the store to go to in our township to purchase “safes” which were behind the counter and not openly discussed. My mother was able to get contraceptive care through her physician, most likely because she was married. The thing that happened in the early 1960s was that birth control pills were developed and sold. They were easy to use and extremely effective. The speakers were right…now the American woman could effectively control her fertility. I took some of those early birth control pills for 5 months in 1962. I took Enovid E and it cost $1.69 in the drug store. After using those birth control pills, I went on to have healthy pregnancies and healthy babies. When my family size was complete, I used birth control pills again. Countless women in my generation used birth control pills and most of them worked outside the home eventually. </p>
<p>Another element:<br />
The American woman moved into the workforce outside of her home out of necessity during World War II. She went back to being a woman focused solely on the work of her family after the war. However, women had learned from that war experience that they could do the work in the factory and in the office and they were good at it. They also filled many important roles in the medical community and had done so for decades. Financial necessity and personal interest sent women back into the workforce armed with a tool that would help them postpone pregnancy, achieve birth spacing and limit the size of their families. Fewer children in a family and Mom’s income helped the family maintain their health and raise and care for their children. </p>
<p>I was already working outside the home by the time Roe v Wade happened in 1973. I came to work at a family planning provider in 1975. Some states had abortion available at that time. Sometimes women needed to travel outside of Wisconsin to obtain an abortion. Within a few years, first-trimester abortion became available in Wisconsin. Women from most parts of the state still had to travel to Madison, Milwaukee, Green Bay or Appleton. They needed a checkup 3 to 4 weeks after the procedure. By 1978 our family planning agency was providing on-site clinics and women came to the local family planning provider for their checkup rather than going out of town again. The confidentiality provided by the family planning clinic was essential to women and their families.</p>
<p>The statewide family planning providers in Wisconsin have prevented thousands and thousands of abortions by providing accessible, affordable, effective contraceptive methods. Today, those family planning providers have another tool to help prevent the unintended pregnancy. That is Emergency Contraception (EC). If taken as soon as possible after any unprotected sexual contact, EC can prevent pregnancy quite effectively.  			…Sue Kettner Family Planning Health Services</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Roe V. Wade: Perspectives Podcast by Lon Newman</title>
		<link>http://belowthewaist.org/2008/02/roe-v-wade-perspectives-podcast/#comment-10</link>
		<author>Lon Newman</author>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 02:23:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://belowthewaist.org/2008/02/roe-v-wade-perspectives-podcast/#comment-10</guid>
		<description>Thanks, Dino - it's fun and a bit unusual to listen thoughtfully to thoughtful people explain their point of view on this very emotionally charged issue . . . (Although I think that Ms. Brown is a long way from reasoned, it's refreshing to hear her calmly describe her perspective.)

The key underlying assumption of the All-America Life League and others that abortion kills a human being "and that's a scientific fact" seems to me to be the fundamental religious assumption from which the extremism springs.  It does seem indisputable that a fertilized egg is human life and living tissue . . . but at what stage of development that living organism becomes a human being has never been universally agreed upon.  It certainly won't be determined by scientific fact as long as the definition of a human being, for most adults in the world, includes the presence of a unique soul that is unweighed, unmeasured, and chemically invisible.  In other words, science falls short of resolving whether/when a soul exists. To make that point clearer . . . we would ask ourselves whether a fertilized egg that later splits in two to form twins had two souls . . . do the children end up with one half soul each . . these are 'angels on the heads of pins' religious questions, but when a life becomes a human being is not determinable by scientists.

So, I agree with Cathy's main points that we've spent a lot of time and energy and resources trying desperately to protect access to safe and legal abortion, contraception and sex education . . . energy and resources that could have been better spent preventing unintended pregnancies.

Thanks, again, to you and Cathy . . . I hope other listeners will enjoy the interviews as much as I did . . . and I hope they'll comment as well.

--Lon--</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Dino - it&#8217;s fun and a bit unusual to listen thoughtfully to thoughtful people explain their point of view on this very emotionally charged issue . . . (Although I think that Ms. Brown is a long way from reasoned, it&#8217;s refreshing to hear her calmly describe her perspective.)</p>
<p>The key underlying assumption of the All-America Life League and others that abortion kills a human being &#8220;and that&#8217;s a scientific fact&#8221; seems to me to be the fundamental religious assumption from which the extremism springs.  It does seem indisputable that a fertilized egg is human life and living tissue . . . but at what stage of development that living organism becomes a human being has never been universally agreed upon.  It certainly won&#8217;t be determined by scientific fact as long as the definition of a human being, for most adults in the world, includes the presence of a unique soul that is unweighed, unmeasured, and chemically invisible.  In other words, science falls short of resolving whether/when a soul exists. To make that point clearer . . . we would ask ourselves whether a fertilized egg that later splits in two to form twins had two souls . . . do the children end up with one half soul each . . these are &#8216;angels on the heads of pins&#8217; religious questions, but when a life becomes a human being is not determinable by scientists.</p>
<p>So, I agree with Cathy&#8217;s main points that we&#8217;ve spent a lot of time and energy and resources trying desperately to protect access to safe and legal abortion, contraception and sex education . . . energy and resources that could have been better spent preventing unintended pregnancies.</p>
<p>Thanks, again, to you and Cathy . . . I hope other listeners will enjoy the interviews as much as I did . . . and I hope they&#8217;ll comment as well.</p>
<p>&#8211;Lon&#8211;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Birth Control Costs to College Students and Low-income Women by Dino Corvino</title>
		<link>http://belowthewaist.org/2008/01/40542/#comment-9</link>
		<author>Dino Corvino</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2008 01:53:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://belowthewaist.org/2008/01/40542/#comment-9</guid>
		<description>Thanks a lot Frances.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks a lot Frances.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
